Authors
Gert van Valkenhoef, Tommi Tervonen, Jing Zhao, Bert de Brock, Hans L Hillege, Douwe Postmus
Publication date
2012/4/1
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
Volume
65
Issue
4
Pages
394-403
Publisher
Pergamon
Description
OBJECTIVE
To enable multicriteria benefit–risk (BR) assessment of any number of alternative treatments using all available evidence from a network of clinical trials.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING
We design a general method for multicriteria decision aiding with criteria measurements from Mixed Treatment Comparison (MTC) analyses. To evaluate the method, we apply it to BR assessment of four second-generation antidepressants and placebo in the setting of a published peer-reviewed systematic review.
RESULTS
The analysis without preference information shows that placebo is supported by a wide range of possible preferences. Preference information provided by a clinical expert showed that although treatment with antidepressants is warranted for severely depressed patients, for mildly depressed patients placebo is likely to be the best option. It is difficult to choose between the four antidepressants, and …
Total citations
201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023357118106125245
Scholar articles
G van Valkenhoef, T Tervonen, J Zhao, B de Brock… - Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2012