Authors
Ariel Malka, Danny Osborne, Christopher J Soto, Lara M Greaves, Chris G Sibley, Yphtach Lelkes
Publication date
2016/9
Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume
42
Issue
9
Pages
1243-1257
Publisher
Sage Publications
Description
Moral foundations theory (MFT) posits that binding moral foundations (purity, authority, and ingroup loyalty) are rooted in the need for groups to promote order and cohesion, and that they therefore underlie political conservatism. We present evidence that binding foundations (and the related construct of disgust sensitivity) are associated with lower levels of ideological polarization on political issues outside the domain of moral traditionalism. Consistent support for this hypothesis was obtained from three large American Internet-based samples and one large national sample of New Zealanders (combined N = 7,874). We suggest that when political issues do not have inherent relevance to moral traditionalism, binding foundations promote a small centrist shift away from ideologically prescribed positions, and that they do so out of desire for national uniformity and cohesion.
Total citations
201720182019202020212022202320243311184104
Scholar articles
A Malka, D Osborne, CJ Soto, LM Greaves, CG Sibley… - Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2016