View article

252• WAGSTAFF, TRIANA, PETERS, & ARREDONDO is surrounded by both attributional and situational ambiguity. We contribute to the literature by taking the theoretical framework elaborated by Knapp et al.(1997) for responses to sexual harassment and applying it to discrimination more generally. As subtle discrimination leads to more ambiguity surrounding the reason (s) for discrimination, we focus on responses to discrimination from supervisors irrespective of reason (s), and we develop a measure that captures these responses. Having such a measure is valuable at a time when discrimination often unfolds as hidden and multidetermined.