View article

We consider a simple model of parallel TCP connections defined as follows. There are N connections competing for a bottleneck of fixed capacity. Each connection is assumed to increase its send rate linearly in time in absence of congestion indication and otherwise decreases its rate to a fraction β of the current send rate. Whenever aggregate send rate of the connections hits the link capacity, a single connection is signalled a congestion indication. Under the prevailing assumptions, and assuming only in addition a mild stability condition, we obtain that the throughput is the factor of the link capacity, 1− 1/(1+ const N), with const=(1+ β)/(1− β).

This result appears to be previously unknown; despite simplicity of its final form, it is not immediate. The result is of practical importance as it elucidates the throughput of parallel TCP sockets, an approach used widely to improve throughput performance of bulk data transfers (eg GridFTP), in regimes when individual connections are none or weakly synchronized. We argue that it is important to distinguish two factors that contribute to TCP throughput deficiency (F1) TCP window synchronization and (F2) TCP window adaptation in congestion avoidance. Our result is a good news as it suggests that in regimes when (F1) does not hold, already a few sockets are enough to almost entirely eliminate the deficiency due to (F2). Specifically, the result suggests that already 3 TCP connections yield 90% link utilization and 95% is almost achieved by 6 connections. This analytically proven result should provide incentive to throughput-greedy users to limit the number of their parallel TCP sockets as a few connections …