Authors
Nathan F Dieckmann, Robin Gregory, Ellen Peters, Robert Hartman
Publication date
2017/3
Journal
Risk analysis
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
471-486
Description
In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.
Total citations
201720182019202020212022202320241511720181410