View article

Territorial Cohesion for many practitioners, researchers, city managers, politicians is still something insubstantial and slippery, but they have the need of packaging this concept. From the Urban pilot projects (1995), through the Urban I and II experiences (from 1994 to 2006), considering the ESDP (1999), until the Leipzig Charter (2007), taking into account the Green paper on Territorial Cohesion (2008) and concluding with the last Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 (2011), we can notice that the Europeanisation of regional and urban policy still remains in a spin! The question remains that the Europeanisation of territorial policies has not bred into a precise relationship between territories (cities, towns, metropolitan areas, regions (elected/functional) needs and EU promoted urban policies. i “With the emergence, in 2010, of the new European Strategy for the European Union–Europe 2020–arises once again the issue of the urban factor. One cannot hide, when analysing the EU’s growth strategy for the coming decade, the fact that the urban dimension is quasi absent from the description of the three priorities and five objectives set by the proposal for cohesion policy from 2013 onwards. The Commission’s initiative runs therefore, and once more, the risk of being disconnected from a blunt economic and geographic reality: European cities are the most important sources of job creation, economic growth and social and technological innovation. Cities also concentrate major social issues and environmental challenges (M. Van Cutsem, 2010)” A leitmotiv of many documents related to EU policies for