Authors
Julia B Bear, Lily Cushenbery, Manuel London, Gary D Sherman
Publication date
2017/12/1
Journal
The Leadership Quarterly
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
721-740
Publisher
JAI
Description
We propose that performance feedback can be a power retention mechanism that puts women at a relative disadvantage and contributes to the lack of women in leadership positions. Feedback is an evaluative process, with the (typically higher-power) source often having considerable discretion and means to deliver feedback and the feedback recipient often being at the mercy of the will of the source. The feedback process, therefore, has a built-in power component that preserves and amplifies existing power differences in organizations (e.g., differences in organizational authority and rank) and disproportionately harms women's leadership development. We develop a theoretical model concerning how power retention conditions (e.g., when giving feedback advances the source's personal status goals) lead to power retention mechanisms in the feedback process, such as patronizing feedback, particularly for …
Total citations
2017201820192020202120222023202417192726262914
Scholar articles
JB Bear, L Cushenbery, M London, GD Sherman - The Leadership Quarterly, 2017