Authors
Andrea Perino, Henrique M Pereira, Laetitia M Navarro, Néstor Fernández, James M Bullock, Silvia Ceaușu, Ainara Cortés-Avizanda, Roel van Klink, Tobias Kuemmerle, Angela Lomba, Guy Pe’er, Tobias Plieninger, José M Rey Benayas, Christopher J Sandom, Jens-Christian Svenning, Helen C Wheeler
Publication date
2019/4/26
Source
Science
Volume
364
Issue
6438
Pages
eaav5570
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science
Description
BACKGROUND
Rapid global change is creating fundamental challenges for the persistence of natural ecosystems and their biodiversity. Conservation efforts aimed at the protection of landscapes have had mixed success, and there is an increasing awareness that the long-term protection of biodiversity requires inclusion of flexible restoration along with protection. Rewilding is one such approach that has been both promoted and criticized in recent years. Proponents emphasize the potential of rewilding to tap opportunities for restoration while creating benefits for both ecosystems and societies. Critics discuss the lack of a consistent definition of rewilding and insufficient knowledge about its potential outcomes. Other criticisms arise from the mistaken notion that rewilding actions are planned without considering societal acceptability and benefits. Here, we present a framework for rewilding actions that can serve as …
Total citations
2019202020212022202320242272881089466
Scholar articles
A Perino, HM Pereira, LM Navarro, N Fernández… - Science, 2019