Authors
Ravi S Hira, Kevin Kennedy, Vijay Nambi, Hani Jneid, Mahboob Alam, Sukhdeep S Basra, P Michael Ho, Anita Deswal, Christie M Ballantyne, Laura A Petersen, Salim S Virani
Publication date
2015/1/20
Journal
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
111-121
Publisher
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Description
Background
Among patients without cardiovascular disease (CVD) and low 10-year CVD risk, the risks of gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic strokes associated with aspirin use outweigh any potential atheroprotective benefit. According to the guidelines on primary prevention of CVD, aspirin use is considered appropriate only in patients with 10-year CVD risk ≥6% and inappropriate in patients with 10-year CVD risk <6%.
Objectives
The goal of this study was to examine the frequency and practice-level variation in inappropriate aspirin use for primary prevention in a large U.S. nationwide registry.
Methods
Within the National Cardiovascular Disease Registry’s Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence registry, we assessed 68,808 unique patients receiving aspirin for primary prevention from 119 U.S. practices. The frequency of inappropriate aspirin use was determined for primary prevention (aspirin use in …
Total citations
201520162017201820192020202120222023202410119167610871