View article

New Phytologist 230 (2021), 1746–1753, doi: 10.1111/nph. 17321. Since its publication, the authors of Still et al.(2021) have brought to our attention an error in their Tansley insight article. In Fig. 4, the ‘Variable importance’panels in the Metolius and Wind River sites were incorrectly displayed. The corrected figure and legend are shown below. We apologize to our readers for this mistake. Corrected Fig. 4 and legend (Figure presented.).