Authors
Amy C Justice, Mildred K Cho, Margaret A Winker, Jesse A Berlin, Drummond Rennie, Peer Investigators, PEER Investigators
Publication date
1998/7/15
Journal
Jama
Volume
280
Issue
3
Pages
240-242
Publisher
American Medical Association
Description
Context
All authors may not be equal in the eyes of reviewers. Specifically, well-known authors may receive less objective (poorer quality) reviews. One study at a single journal found a small improvement in review quality when reviewers were masked to author identity.
Objectives
To determine whether masking reviewers to author identity is generally associated with higher quality of review at biomedical journals, and to determine the success of routine masking techniques.
Design and Setting
A randomized controlled trial performed on external reviews of manuscripts submitted to Annals of Emergency Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Obstetrics & Gynecology , and Ophthalmology .
Interventions
Two peers reviewed each manuscript. In one study arm, both peer reviewers received the manuscript according to usual masking practice. In the other arm, one reviewer was randomized to receive a manuscript …
Total citations
19981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202441381816771117131220161413109161614106131814124