View article

This paper evaluates the added-value of using short-range ensemble flood forecasts for the emergency management of a severe flash-flood event. The considered flood hit several inhabited areas in the Aude River basin, south-eastern France, in October 2018. Particularly, the capacity to trigger timely rescue operations at the right places is evaluated and compared, depending on the input information used in the emergency decision process: from rainfall observations up to flash flood impacts forecasts at the river reach scale. To achieve this evaluation, the field operations of firemen rescue teams are simulated in an agent-based model, which provides a detailed description of the complexity of the emergency situation: location and timing of flood damages, limited number of rescue teams, traveling times, decisions taken under uncertainty about the future evolution of the event. The flash flood impacts forecasts involved in the decisions are obtained using i) three different short range (0-6h) quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) products or a naive zero future rainfall scenario, ii) a distributed hydrological model and iii) a simple impacts model evaluating the number of flooded buildings. The presented results confirm that the efficiency of the rescue operations is generally improved when using QPFs as input of the decision chain, thanks to the increased anticipation. But they also illustrate how this added value can be highly altered by the combined effects of forecast uncertainties (false alarms) and limited available rescue means. In a fictive situation where rescue means are extremely limited, using a zero future rainfall scenario proves to be as …