Authors
John S Sperry, Nicanor Z Saliendra, William T Pockman, Herve Cochard, Pierre Cruiziat, Stephen D Davis, Frank W Ewers, Melvin T Tyree
Publication date
1996/4
Journal
Plant, Cell & Environment
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
427-436
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Description
Pressure probe measurements have been interpreted as showing that xylem pressures below c. –0.4 MPa do not exist and that pressure chamber measurements of lower negative pressures are invalid. We present new evidence supporting the pressure chamber technique and the existence of xylem pressures well below –0.4 MPa. We deduced xylem pressures in water‐stressed stem xylem from the following experiment: (1) loss of hydraulic conductivity in hydrated stem xylem (xylem pressure = atmospheric pressure) was induced by forcing compressed air into intact xylem conduits; (2) loss of hydraulic conductivity from cavitation and embolism in dehydrating stems was measured, and (3) the xylem pressure in dehydrated stems was deduced as being equal and opposite to the air pressure causing the same loss of hydraulic conductivity in hydrated stems. Pressures determined in this way are only valid if …
Total citations
199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320244631661191055435321069325761042612
Scholar articles