Authors
Karin Mogg, Andrew Mathews, Michael Eysenck
Publication date
1992/3/1
Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
149-159
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Description
Attentional responses to threat stimuli were assessed in anxious patients, normal controls, and subjects who had recovered from a clinical anxiety state. The main aims of the study were: (1) to replicate MacLeod, Mathews, and Tata's (1986) finding of an attentional bias to threat in currently anxious patients compared with normal control subjects; (2) to assess whether the bias is related to the predominant worries of anxious patients; and (3) to investigate whether the bias is present in recovered anxious patients. The original finding of an anxiety-related attentional bias was replicated. The results indicated that the extent to which anxious patients selectively attended to social threat words was associated with the seventy of their social worries. The attentional responses of the recovered anxious group were not significantly differentiated from those of the currently anxious or normal control groups.
Total citations
Scholar articles
K Mogg, A Mathews, M Eysenck - Cognition & Emotion, 1992