Authors
Stacey B Scott, Martin J Sliwinski, Matthew Zawadzki, Robert S Stawski, Jinhyuk Kim, David Marcusson-Clavertz, Stephanie T Lanza, David E Conroy, Orfeu Buxton, David M Almeida, Joshua M Smyth
Publication date
2020/12
Journal
Assessment
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1683-1698
Publisher
Sage Publications
Description
Despite widespread interest in variance in affect, basic questions remain pertaining to the relative proportions of between-person and within-person variance, the contribution of days and moments, and the reliability of these estimates. We addressed these questions by decomposing negative affect and positive affect variance across three levels (person, day, moment), and calculating reliability using a coordinated analysis of seven daily diary, ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and diary-EMA hybrid studies (across studies age = 18-84 years, total Npersons = 2,103, total Nobservations = 45,065). Across studies, within-person variance was sizeable (negative affect: 45% to 66%, positive affect: 25% to 74%); in EMA more within-person variance was attributable to momentary rather than daily level. Reliability was adequate to high at all levels of analysis (within-person: .73-.91; between-person: .96-1.00 …
Total citations
2019202020212022202320246921212417
Scholar articles
SB Scott, MJ Sliwinski, M Zawadzki, RS Stawski, J Kim… - Assessment, 2020