Authors
Paul G Shekelle, Gunnar Andersson, Daniel Cherkin, Richard Deyo, Robert Keller, Casey Lee, Matthew Liang, Bailey Lipscomb, Kevin Spratt, James Weinstein
Publication date
1994/9/15
Journal
Spine
Volume
19
Issue
18
Pages
2028S-2031S
Publisher
LWW
Description
Clinicians are bombarded by reports of new diagnostic tests or treatments for patients with spine problems. To provide the best possible patient care, clinicians need to be able to critically appraise the results of such studies for validity and relevance to patient care. Important questions to be asked of any description of diagnostic or treatment studies are the following questions: 1) Are the patients described in detail so that you can decide whether they are comparable to those that you see in your practice? 2) Are the treatments or assessments described well enough so that you could provide the same for your patients? 3) Was a clinically relevant endpoint measured? 4) Is there an appropriate comaparison group? 5) Are potential sources of bias appropriately attended to? 6) Are the results clinically significant?
Total citations
19951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202416311137211252511321412222
Scholar articles