Authors
James W Kirchner, Xiahong Feng, Colin Neal, Alice J Robson
Publication date
2004/5
Journal
Hydrological processes
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
1353-1359
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Description
Science is often driven forward by the emergence of new measurements. Whenever one makes observations at a scale, precision, or frequency that was previously unattainable, one is almost guaranteed to learn something new and interesting. Our purpose in this commentary is to argue that catchment hydrochemistry is on the verge of just such a major new advance, driven by automated, online continuous analysis for many chemical constituents in natural waters.
To date, most catchment hydrochemical studies have been based on hourly or sub-hourly measurements of water fluxes, and weekly or monthly samples of rainfall and streamflow chemistry. This stark mismatch in measurement time scales springs from the measurement technologies involved. Water flux measurements are easily automated, and can be logged at any interval that is desired. Conventional laboratory measurements of water chemistry, by contrast, are time consuming and expensive, and at high sampling frequencies the sample bottles pile up fast. For this reason, high-frequency chemical monitoring has typically been restricted to intensive studies of individual storm events.
Total citations
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202441519121216141530281926343435272528252214
Scholar articles