Authors
Olivier Rascol, David J Brooks, Amos D Korczyn, Peter P De Deyn, Carl E Clarke, Anthony E Lang
Publication date
2000/5/18
Journal
New England Journal of Medicine
Volume
342
Issue
20
Pages
1484-1491
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Description
Background
There is debate about whether the initial treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease should be levodopa or a dopamine agonist.
Methods
In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the safety and efficacy of the dopamine D2–receptor agonist ropinirole with that of levodopa over a period of five years in 268 patients with early Parkinson's disease. If symptoms were not adequately controlled by the assigned study medication, patients could receive supplementary levodopa, administered in an open-label fashion. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of dyskinesia.
Results
Eighty-five of the 179 patients in the ropinirole group (47 percent) and 45 of the 89 patients in the levodopa group (51 percent) completed all five years of the study. In the ropinirole group, 29 of the 85 patients (34 percent) received no levodopa supplementation. The analysis of the time to …
Total citations
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024236010210810311310412311810010510093799282718466515843473817