Authors
Yinqiu Ji, Louise Ashton, Scott M Pedley, David P Edwards, Yong Tang, Akihiro Nakamura, Roger Kitching, Paul M Dolman, Paul Woodcock, Felicity A Edwards, Trond H Larsen, Wayne W Hsu, Suzan Benedick, Keith C Hamer, David S Wilcove, Catharine Bruce, Xiaoyang Wang, Taal Levi, Martin Lott, Brent C Emerson, Douglas W Yu
Publication date
2013/10
Journal
Ecology letters
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1245-1257
Description
To manage and conserve biodiversity, one must know what is being lost, where, and why, as well as which remedies are likely to be most effective. Metabarcoding technology can characterise the species compositions of mass samples of eukaryotes or of environmental DNA. Here, we validate metabarcoding by testing it against three high‐quality standard data sets that were collected in Malaysia (tropical), China (subtropical) and the United Kingdom (temperate) and that comprised 55,813 arthropod and bird specimens identified to species level with the expenditure of 2,505 person‐hours of taxonomic expertise. The metabarcode and standard data sets exhibit statistically correlated alpha‐ and beta‐diversities, and the two data sets produce similar policy conclusions for two conservation applications: restoration ecology and systematic conservation planning. Compared with standard biodiversity data sets …
Total citations
20132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202432746656680749470735740
Scholar articles