Authors
Liesbeth KJ Baartman, Theo J Bastiaens, Paul A Kirschner, Cees PM Van der Vleuten
Publication date
2007/1/1
Source
Educational research review
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
114-129
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
Because learning and instruction are increasingly competence-based, the call for assessment methods to adequately determine competence is growing. Using just one single assessment method is not sufficient to determine competence acquisition. This article argues for Competence Assessment Programmes (CAPs), consisting of a combination of different assessment methods, including both traditional and new forms of assessment. To develop and evaluate CAPs, criteria to determine their quality are needed. Just as CAPs are combinations of traditional and new forms of assessment, criteria used to evaluate CAP quality should be derived from both psychometrics and edumetrics. A framework of 10 quality criteria for CAPs is presented, which is then compared to Messick's framework of construct validity. Results show that the 10-criterion framework partly overlaps with Messick's, but adds some important new …
Total citations
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024612162737243022404246415029513611
Scholar articles