Authors
Heli Saarikoski, Eeva Primmer, Sanna-Riikka Saarela, Paula Antunes, Réka Aszalós, Francesc Baró, Pam Berry, Gemma Garcia Blanko, Erik Goméz-Baggethun, Laurence Carvalho, Jan Dick, Robert Dunford, Mihail Hanzu, Paula A Harrison, Zita Izakovicova, Miklós Kertész, Leena Kopperoinen, Berit Köhler, Johannes Langemeyer, David Lapola, Camino Liquete, Sandra Luque, Peter Mederly, Jari Niemelä, Ignacio Palomo, Guillermo Martinez Pastur, Pablo Luis Peri, Elena Preda, Jörg A Priess, Rui Santos, Christian Schleyer, Francis Turkelboom, Angheluta Vadineanu, Wim Verheyden, Suvi Vikström, Juliette Young
Publication date
2018/2/1
Journal
Ecosystem services
Volume
29
Pages
579-598
Publisher
Elsevier
Description
The promise that ecosystem service assessments will contribute to better decision-making is not yet proven. We analyse how knowledge on ecosystem services is actually used to inform land and water management in 22 case studies covering different social-ecological systems in European and Latin American countries. None of the case studies reported instrumental use of knowledge in a sense that ecosystem service knowledge would have served as an impartial arbiter between policy options. Yet, in most cases, there was some evidence of conceptual learning as a result of close interaction between researchers, practitioners and stakeholders. We observed several factors that constrained knowledge uptake, including competing interests and political agendas, scientific disputes, professional norms and competencies, and lack of vertical and horizontal integration. Ecosystem knowledge played a small role …
Total citations
20172018201920202021202220232024317322734312613
Scholar articles
H Saarikoski, E Primmer, SR Saarela, P Antunes… - Ecosystem services, 2018