Authors
Enrique Valencia, Francesco De Bello, Thomas Galland, Peter B Adler, Jan Lepš, Anna E-Vojtkó, Roel van Klink, Carlos P Carmona, Jiří Danihelka, Jürgen Dengler, David J Eldridge, Marc Estiarte, Ricardo García-González, Eric Garnier, Daniel Gómez‐García, Susan P Harrison, Tomáš Herben, Ricardo Ibáñez, Anke Jentsch, Norbert Juergens, Miklós Kertész, Katja Klumpp, Frédérique Louault, Rob H Marrs, Romà Ogaya, Gábor Ónodi, Robin J Pakeman, Iker Pardo, Meelis Pärtel, Begoña Peco, Josep Peñuelas, Richard F Pywell, Marta Rueda, Wolfgang Schmidt, Ute Schmiedel, Martin Schuetz, Hana Skálová, Petr Šmilauer, Marie Šmilauerová, Christian Smit, MingHua Song, Martin Stock, James Val, Vigdis Vandvik, David Ward, Karsten Wesche, Susan K Wiser, Ben A Woodcock, Truman P Young, Fei-Hai Yu, Martin Zobel, Lars Götzenberger
Publication date
2020/9/29
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume
117
Issue
39
Pages
24345-24351
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Description
The stability of ecological communities is critical for the stable provisioning of ecosystem services, such as food and forage production, carbon sequestration, and soil fertility. Greater biodiversity is expected to enhance stability across years by decreasing synchrony among species, but the drivers of stability in nature remain poorly resolved. Our analysis of time series from 79 datasets across the world showed that stability was associated more strongly with the degree of synchrony among dominant species than with species richness. The relatively weak influence of species richness is consistent with theory predicting that the effect of richness on stability weakens when synchrony is higher than expected under random fluctuations, which was the case in most communities. Land management, nutrient addition, and climate change treatments had relatively weak and varying effects on stability, modifying how species …
Scholar articles
E Valencia, F De Bello, T Galland, PB Adler, J Lepš… - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020