Authors
Zara M Bergström, David G Williams, Mariam Bhula, Dinkar Sharma
Publication date
2016/7/15
Journal
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209 USA journals-info@ mit. edu
Description
Distractibility can lead to accidents and academic failures as well as memory problems. Recent evidence suggests that intentional recognition memory can be biased by unintentional recognition of distracting stimuli in the same environment. It is unknown whether unintentional and intentional recognition depend on the same underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We assessed whether human participants' recognition of previously seen (old) or not seen (new) target stimuli was affected by whether a to-be-ignored distractor was old or new. ERPs were recorded to investigate the neural correlates of this bias. The results showed that the old/new status of salient distractors had a biasing effect on target recognition accuracy. Both intentional and unintentional recognition elicited early ERP effects that are thought to reflect relatively automatic memory processes. However, only intentional recognition elicited the later …
Total citations
201720182019202020212022202320241324421
Scholar articles
ZM Bergström, DG Williams, M Bhula, D Sharma - Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2016