| Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis H Oosterbeek, R Sloof, G Van De Kuilen Experimental economics 7, 171-188, 2004 | 1242 | 2004 |
| Higher order risk attitudes, demographics, and financial decisions CN Noussair, ST Trautmann, G Van de Kuilen Review of Economic Studies 81 (1), 325-355, 2014 | 493 | 2014 |
| Ambiguity attitudes ST Trautmann, G Van De Kuilen The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making 2, 89-116, 2015 | 391 | 2015 |
| A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population AS Booij, BMS Van Praag, G Van De Kuilen Theory and Decision 68, 115-148, 2010 | 357 | 2010 |
| A truth serum for non-bayesians: Correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes T Offerman, J Sonnemans, G Van de Kuilen, PP Wakker The Review of Economic Studies 76 (4), 1461-1489, 2009 | 284 | 2009 |
| A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory AS Booij, G Van de Kuilen Journal of Economic psychology 30 (4), 651-666, 2009 | 268 | 2009 |
| Risk aversion and religion CN Noussair, ST Trautmann, G Van de Kuilen, N Vellekoop Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 47, 165-183, 2013 | 247 | 2013 |
| Belief elicitation: A horse race among truth serums ST Trautmann, G van de Kuilen The Economic Journal 125 (589), 2116-2135, 2015 | 188 | 2015 |
| Social class and (un) ethical behavior: A framework, with evidence from a large population sample ST Trautmann, G Van De Kuilen, RJ Zeckhauser Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (5), 487-497, 2013 | 163 | 2013 |
| The midweight method to measure attitudes toward risk and ambiguity G Van De Kuilen, PP Wakker Management Science 57 (3), 582-598, 2011 | 119 | 2011 |
| Higher order risk attitudes: A review of experimental evidence ST Trautmann, G van de Kuilen European Economic Review 103, 108-124, 2018 | 92 | 2018 |
| Learning in the Allais paradox G Kuilen, PP Wakker Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 33, 155-164, 2006 | 82 | 2006 |
| Prospect theory or construal level theory?: Diminishing sensitivity vs. psychological distance in risky decisions ST Trautmann, G van de Kuilen Acta psychologica 139 (1), 254-260, 2012 | 59 | 2012 |
| Discriminating between models of ambiguity attitude: A qualitative test R Cubitt, G Van De Kuilen, S Mukerji Journal of the European Economic Association 18 (2), 708-749, 2020 | 49 | 2020 |
| Subjective probability weighting and the discovered preference hypothesis G Van de Kuilen Theory and decision 67, 1-22, 2009 | 49 | 2009 |
| Measuring higher order ambiguity preferences A Baillon, H Schlesinger, G van de Kuilen Experimental economics 21 (2), 233-256, 2018 | 46 | 2018 |
| Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain AE Attema, O l’Haridon, G van de Kuilen Journal of health economics 64, 15-24, 2019 | 43 | 2019 |
| Process fairness, outcome fairness, and dynamic consistency: Experimental evidence for risk and ambiguity ST Trautmann, G van de Kuilen Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 53, 75-88, 2016 | 42 | 2016 |
| Measuring multivariate risk preferences S Ebert, G van de Kuilen Available at SSRN 2637964, 2015 | 41 | 2015 |
| The strength of sensitivity to ambiguity R Cubitt, G van de Kuilen, S Mukerji Theory and decision 85, 275-302, 2018 | 33 | 2018 |
Adam BooijUniversity of AmsterdamVerified email at uva.nl
