Articles with public access mandates - Paul EastwickLearn more
Available somewhere: 21
Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies
S Joel, PW Eastwick, CJ Allison, XB Arriaga, ZG Baker, E Bar-Kalifa, ...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (32), 19061-19071, 2020
Mandates: US National Science Foundation, Swiss National Science Foundation, US …
“Going out” of the box: Close intercultural friendships and romantic relationships spark creativity, workplace innovation, and entrepreneurship.
JG Lu, AC Hafenbrack, PW Eastwick, DJ Wang, WW Maddux, ...
Journal of Applied Psychology 102 (7), 1091, 2017
Mandates: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal
Is romantic desire predictable? Machine learning applied to initial romantic attraction
S Joel, PW Eastwick, EJ Finkel
Psychological science 28 (10), 1478-1489, 2017
Mandates: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Canada
Psychological science in the wake of COVID-19: Social, methodological, and metascientific considerations
DL Rosenfeld, E Balcetis, B Bastian, ET Berkman, JK Bosson, ...
Perspectives on Psychological Science 17 (2), 311-333, 2022
Mandates: US National Science Foundation, US National Institutes of Health
Dominant, open nonverbal displays are attractive at zero-acquaintance
T Vacharkulksemsuk, E Reit, P Khambatta, PW Eastwick, EJ Finkel, ...
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (15), 4009-4014, 2016
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Is love colorblind? Political orientation and interracial romantic desire
PW Eastwick, JA Richeson, D Son, EJ Finkel
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35 (9), 1258-1268, 2009
Mandates: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
What do short-term and long-term relationships look like? Building the relationship coordination and strategic timing (ReCAST) model.
PW Eastwick, E Keneski, TA Morgan, MA McDonald, SA Huang
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147 (5), 747, 2018
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Do ideal partner preferences predict divorce? A tale of two metrics
PW Eastwick, LA Neff
Social Psychological and Personality Science 3 (6), 667-674, 2012
Mandates: US National Institutes of Health
Summarized attribute preferences have unique antecedents and consequences.
A da Silva Frost, YA Wang, PW Eastwick, A Ledgerwood
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2022
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Consistency and inconsistency among romantic partners over time.
PW Eastwick, KP Harden, JA Shukusky, TA Morgan, S Joel
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112 (6), 838, 2017
Mandates: US National Science Foundation, US National Institutes of Health
Explaining illness with evil: pathogen prevalence fosters moral vitalism
B Bastian, CM Vauclair, S Loughnan, P Bain, A Ashokkumar, M Becker, ...
Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286 (1914), 20191576, 2019
Mandates: Australian Research Council
Implicit bias≠ bias on implicit measures
B Gawronski, A Ledgerwood, PW Eastwick
Psychological Inquiry 33 (3), 139-155, 2022
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
The emerging integration of close relationships research and evolutionary psychology
PW Eastwick
Current Directions in Psychological Science 25 (3), 183-190, 2016
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Predicting romantic interest during early relationship development: A preregistered investigation using machine learning
PW Eastwick, S Joel, KL Carswell, DC Molden, EJ Finkel, SA Blozis
European Journal of Personality 37 (3), 276-312, 2023
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Desirable but not smart: Preference for smarter romantic partners impairs women's STEM outcomes
LE Park, AF Young, PW Eastwick, JD Troisi, L Streamer
Journal of Applied Social Psychology 46 (3), 158-179, 2016
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Mate evaluation theory.
PW Eastwick, EJ Finkel, S Joel
Psychological Review 130 (1), 211, 2023
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Negligible evidence that people desire partners who uniquely fit their ideals
J Sparks, C Daly, BM Wilkey, DC Molden, EJ Finkel, PW Eastwick
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 90, 103968, 2020
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Implicit bias and antidiscrimination policy
B Gawronski, A Ledgerwood, PW Eastwick
Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (2), 99-106, 2020
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Initial impressions of compatibility and mate value predict later dating and romantic interest
A Baxter, JA Maxwell, KL Bales, EJ Finkel, EA Impett, PW Eastwick
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (45), e2206925119, 2022
Mandates: US National Science Foundation
Measurement invariance of the moral vitalism scale across 28 cultural groups
M Rudnev, CM Vauclair, S Aminihajibashi, M Becker, M Bilewicz, ...
PloS one 15 (6), e0233989, 2020
Mandates: Australian Research Council, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Portugal
Publication and funding information is determined automatically by a computer program